Articles Published in 2026
Search by faculty:
(Alphabetical by Faculty Last Name)
"Seasonality, Weather, and Obstetric Level of Care: An Analysis of Rural Delivery Locations"
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Andreas Thorsen · Associate Professor of Management
Co-author: Maggie Thorsen, Montana State University
Co-author: Ronald G. McGarvey, University of Missouri
Sean Harris · Assistant Professor of Accounting
Abstract:
"Framing novelty in crowdfunding: Which words win support, where, and at what stakes"
Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
Agnieszka Kwapisz · Professor of Management
Research Summary: We examine how promotional language (“hype”) in reward-based crowdfunding is associated with campaign success, and whether those associations vary across sector contexts and with campaign execution burden. Using dictionary-based text measures from 635 U.S. Kickstarter campaigns across five sectors, we distinguish three novelty-framing moves: capability/rigor language, excellence/status language, and attitude/affect language. We find no uniform association between aggregate hype and success. Instead, the observed associations vary systematically across rhetorical moves, sectors, and goal levels. Capability/rigor language is positively associated with success in Technology, attitude/affect language is positively associated with success in Entertainment, and excellence/status language is negatively associated with success in Design. Beyond these sector differences, the paper's clearest cross-cutting pattern is that capability/rigor language becomes more positively associated with success as funding goals increase.
Managerial Summary: The value of “hype” on Kickstarter depends on what is said, what is being offered,
and how ambitious the ask is. In our data, Technology campaigns are more positively
associated with success when descriptions emphasize testing, technical specificity,
and execution readiness, whereas Entertainment campaigns are more positively associated
with attitude/affect language. In contrast, excellence/status claims are associated
with lower success in Design. Across contexts, the clearest pattern is that feasibility-oriented
language becomes more positively associated with success as funding goals increase,
suggesting that larger asks benefit more from cues of deliverability than from undifferentiated
promotional intensity.
"Emotional intelligence of artificial intelligence: Generation Z's digital connectedness and virtual-to-real behavioral spillover"
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Christine (Eunyoung) Sung · Professor of Marketing
Research Purpose: This study’s aim is to examine the effects of actual metaverse users’ parasocial relationships with artificial intelligence– (AI-) controlled non-player characters (NPCs) on digital luxury non-fungible token (NFT) brand preferences leading to behavioral intentions (e.g. online and offline purchase intentions, virtual-to-real behavioral activities, NFT luxury brand endorsements on social medial platforms). The study focuses on Gen Z users who seek escapism by forming parasocial relationships with NPCs, which ultimately leads to digital NFT brand preference and, in turn, affects their behavioral intentions to consume luxury fashion brands.
Research Findings: Among the metaverse users, the parasocial relationships with AI-controlled NPCs formed
through NPCs’ emotional and cognitive intelligence lead to metaverse social connectedness,
which in turn results in luxury NFT brand preferences and a virtual-to-real behavioral
spillover. Furthermore, Gen Z users’ positive virtual social connectedness influences
not only their metaverse purchase intentions but also their real-world purchase intentions
through a virtual-to-real behavioral spillover, highlighting the positive function
of AI.
"Public Policy Perception Processing: A Conceptual Framework and Theory-Based Research Agenda"
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing
Eric Van Steenburg · Associate Professor of Marketing
Co-author: Riley Van Steenburg, American University
Abstract: If the electorate is as polarized as evidence suggests, the opportunity to galvanize stakeholders around public policy may be a pipe dream. Yet, that is the charge of marketers involved in policymaking. Therefore, it is crucial to understand what is not yet known—the cognitive process individuals follow when considering a policy. Drawing on theory from marketing, psychology, and political science, this research builds a conceptual framework that identifies the cognitive process individuals follow that results in attitudes and behavior. Implementation examples offer opportunities for practitioners to apply the concepts, and a research agenda provides direction for academics.

